I would imagine that the ultimate aim for any aspiring vertebrate
field palaeontologist is to find a new species or perhaps find as perfect and
articulated a specimen as could possibly be discovered. Of course, both are
incredibly difficult to achieve but that does not mean that it is impossible
and consistent sampling in the correct rocks should, on the face of it,
eventually produce the goods and even the most heavily sampled formations in
the world continue to throw up surprises.
The Morrison Formation of North America is just such a place
and, even after nearly 140 years of field work, continues to produce and there
are still new dinosaur taxa to be announced in the not too distant future.
Other highly productive formations, such as the Hell Creek, Two Medicine and
Dinosaur Park also, from time to time, throw up something new and throw a
spanner into the sometime static dinosaurian status quo. Micropalaeontology
also reveals that some formations have yet to yield many dinosaurian taxa since,
although there are quite often teeth that are identifiable at the generic
level, there is a distinct lack of skeletal remains to identify the specific owners
of these teeth and there is the likelihood that some of these will be new to
science.
Of course, formations such as these are not just restricted
to North America and some are much closer to home. The Oxford Clay Formation in
the UK is one of these and is one of the most heavily sampled and best known
fossil lagerstätten
in the world and yet even now new specimens are still occasionally described
(Cruickshank et al 1996; Ketchum
& Benson 2011) and those of us who work in the strata are continually
surprised at what pops up from time to time.
There is no doubt, however, that workers today are at a
serious disadvantage when it comes to new specimens being located. The golden
age of discovery, such as when the Leeds brothers amassed their vast
collections, was during the late 1800’s to the early 1900’s. During this period
house building was at its peak and demand for bricks was high and, since this
was during the days before mechanisation, most clay was removed from the
quarries by hand. This, of course, allowed for a far greater discovery of
vertebrate fossils and many fine specimens were removed. Indeed, it was common
practice for workers to be paid for every bucket of fossils they produced – a
tactic used during the earliest days of fossil bone collecting. Mantell was one
of the first and many others over the years have employed the same tactic.
The onset of mechanisation changed everything and the
discovery of relatively complete articulated specimens began to drop off
although new specimens were continually found throughout the 20th
century. As mechanisation became more complex and the spectre of health and
safety came to the fore during the 80’s and 90’s then the amount of specimens
continually diminished with only a small proportion being recovered after being
located by permitted visiting groups. The time of anyone asking to be allowed
into a quarry to look for fossils as a hobby was over; this was also a loss,
because several important specimens were located by these dedicated amateurs.
Today, there are hardly any quarries left and those that
remain are heavily regulated and access is nearly always denied. However, the
clay is still the same as it ever was and there must be many fine specimens
still awaiting discovery. Chief amongst these, and the ultimate aim for
somebody like me, are the pliosaurs – especially Liopleurodon.
![]() |
| A big Liopleurodon tooth comes to light |
Liopleurodon was
one of the largest pliosaurs and is easily comparable to other well-known
animals such as the Westbury Pliosaurus (Sassoon et al 2012), the as yet undescribed Dorset giant that made the news last year
and the badly managed monster, the so called “Predator X”, from Svalbard within
the Arctic Circle.
The skulls of these large pliosaurs are immense, approaching
3 metres in length, and are capable of producing an incredibly powerful bite
force. This power was generated by enormous muscles and the muscle attachments
on the lower jaw are massive and were coupled with a neck that was also heavily
muscled. This massive head was propelled by an enormous and powerful body and
this combination made these marine reptiles the super predators of their day.
Interestingly, however, preserved stomach contents for big
pliosaurs are rare. One particular Liopleurodon
specimen from the Oxford Clay was said to display fish scales and belemnite
hooklets and little else – apart from a few stones - but this specimen was
apparently a juvenile and may not reflect the actual dietary preferences of an adult.
However, it is pretty obvious that these macro predators
were not content with merely munching on fish and squid. Approaching 15 metres
in length and maybe more, large pliosaurs would have needed larger prey to
sustain their large body size and their contemporaries in the oceans would have
fitted the bill nicely. There are numerous bones from plesiosaurs and marine
crocodiles that display predation marks including puncture wounds, scraping and
evidence of chewing – and these quite clearly demonstrate morphologies
indicating that large pliosaurs such as Liopleurodon
were the most likely perpetrators.
It would be amazing to locate a big, fairly complete
articulated pliosaur from the Oxford Clay – especially Liopleurodon. Just before Quarry 4 was closed, we were starting to
find bits and pieces including teeth and a large vertebra from this pliosaur
but we ran out of time and were unable to locate any more bone and, as you cans
see from the photograph below, the quarry is slowly being returned to nature
and gradually filling up with water. The Liopleurodon
site is now buried forever which is a shame but one of those things.
So a big articulated pliosaur with a complete skull loaded
with teeth, around 30 feet long with every single bone in place - that would do
nicely! Ah – we can dream. Maybe one day……..
References
Cruickshank, Arthur R I, Martill, David M and Noè, Leslie;
1996; A pliosaur (Reptilia, Sauropterygia) exhibiting pachyostosis from the
Middle Jurassic of England; Journal of
the Geological Society of London;
153 pp.873-879
Ketchum, H.F. and R. B. J. Benson. 2011. A new
pliosaurid (Sauropterygia, Plesiosauria) from the Oxford Clay Formation (Middle
Jurassic, Callovian) of England: evidence for a gracile, longirostrine grade of
Early-Middle Jurassic pliosaurids. Special
Papers in Palaeontology 86:109-129
Sassoon, J., Noé, L. F. and Benton, M. J. (2012),
Cranial anatomy, taxonomic implications and palaeopathology of an Upper
Jurassic Pliosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from Westbury, Wiltshire, UK. Palaeontology, 55: 743–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01151.x


Q4.jpg)
2 comments:
Mark,
I would go further and same the majority of important Oxford Clay specimens, since the days of the Leeds brothers, have been found by dedicated amateurs. There must be dozens of partial or complete skeletons being destroyed each year as a result of a policy of zero or restricted access. Many are only accessible for a short period before being bulldozed over or inundated. Health and safety policies and political correctness have a lot to answer for!
Its no good relying on the academics to do the prospecting as they are too few in number and have very limited field time (Dave Martill was an exception in his Phd days, before pterosaurs took over).
However, given your experience and track record you should be able to get permission for more frequent access, I would have thought.
Paul
Hi Paul and thanks for the comments. It's possible that there may be room to manouever in the future but it is all very uncertain just now and seems unlikely.
Post a Comment