The teeth of dinosaurs continue to fascinate. They are often
well preserved, vary in shape and can be extremely large and impressive. They
have also been intensely studied for function and morphology – I am fully aware
of this fascination since I myself have been researching tyrannosaur teeth for
a few years now.
But claws are another matter and, in particular, the manual
unguals. But now Christopher Noto, of the University of Wisconsin-Parkside, has
started to address this issue. Claws, like teeth, also show a huge variance in
morphology but despite this it would appear that they were all universally utilised
for predation. But is this actually the case?
The author analysed a total of 200 claws representing 80
taxa and a combination of methodologies including principal component analysis,
reveal that nail curvature and nail size (relative to the ungual body) display
the most morphological change and variance. This analysis also reveals that digit 1 is
nearly always the most morphologically different when compared with the other
digits.
Highlights include the fact that there is a significant
difference in claw shape between coelurosaurs and non-coelurosaurs and the
author suggests this demonstrates that coelurosaurs were ecologically
more diverse. Non-coelurosaur claws are nearly always evolved with predation in
mind. The diversification in coelurosaurian claws can be seen to evolve in
stages as each clade moves to more derived forms. Examples include
tyrannosaurid claws which are wickedly hooked and ornithomimids claws which
became longer and straighter. Aviale and Deinonychosauria demonstrate a further
extreme morphology which is likely to be indicative of a specialist climbing
and/or grasping adaption.
This research into claw morphology and function further
highlights the amazing variety within Theropoda and is a useful tool for
determining their ecological differences and as an aide in establishing the
mechanics of the theropod manus and, ultimately, will be useful for cladistics.
Oliver Rauhut, of the Bayerische Staatssammlung für
Paläontologie und Geologie in Munich and Pol Diego, of the Museo Paleontológico
Egidio Feruglio in Argentina, presented at SVP a quite bizarre looking new
basal tetanuran. The specimen was found in the Middle Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto
Formation in Chubut Province, Argentina. This formation has already revealed
two other similar forms in the shape of Piatnitzkysaurus
and Condorraptor.
The images presented revealed an unusual suite of characters
that were readily apparent even though we were looking at the screen from
distance. The specimen is fairly complete with elements
of both the axial and appendicular skeleton present and, most importantly, a
virtually complete skull. Any tetanuran from the Middle Jurassic is rare and to
have one preserved this way is quite spectacular.
Firstly, it is a large animal with the skull around 0.8
metres in length. Secondly, it is clearly different from the aforementioned Piatnitzkysaurus and Condorraptor and was designated as a new
taxon almost immediately. It does, however, demonstrate a suite of characters
that are almost mongrel-like in their affinities. There are the expected multiple tetanuran
synapomorphies but there are also unexpected plesiomorphic characters, such as
the short and distally expansive scapula, that are not usually seen in
tetanurans.
To confuse matters more, the animal also shares derived
characters that are found in both megalosauroids and allosauroids. For example,
the maxillary fenestra is closed medially (a character found in megalosauroids)
but the well developed lacrimal horn is clearly an allosauroid trait. This specimen is SO weird but, since it is a
basal tetanuran, incredibly important and the bizarre combination of characters
lead the authors to believe that a monophyletic Carnosauria is a very real
possibility or, on the other hand, may be evidence of homoplasy in early
tetanuran evolution. My feel from the authors on this is that they favour the
first option.
![]() |
| Allosaurus |
The Witmer Lab of Ohio University was well represented at
this year’s SVP and one study, led by Eric Snively, looked at feeding motions
in that well known Late Jurassic theropod Allosaurus.
Despite numerous studies that have analysed the biomechanics of the skull, very
little research has looked at the overall motion of the head and neck. In this
case, the authors used one well preserved specimen to use for their template.
Typically, the authors utilised the very latest in digital
technology to bring these motions to life in Allosaurus. A combination of CT scanning of the skull and soft
tissue reconstruction enabled three dimensional modelling that was highly
detailed and included reconstructing sinuses, airways and bone density.
Multi-body dynamics allowed that their attention to detail and allowance for
every single known permutation and/or variation enabled them to come up with
the most vigorous reconstruction yet of Allosaurus.
This specimen of Allosaurus
has demonstrated that lateral angular acceleration was rapid – twice as
fast as those calculated for Tyrannosaurus
although dorsiflexive acceleration was comparable. Powerful coordination of
lateroflexive muscles enabled rapid flexion of the cervical spine allowing the
head to move down fast. However, due to the narrow build of the skull and a low
ability in being able to power the head in a side to side motion suggests that Allosaurus pulled its head right back
when feeding – a motion reinforced by the high sagittal mobility of the neck.
This combination of evidence suggests that Allosaurus dismembered and fed on their
carcasses very much like raptors of today and are therefore very different from
tyrannosaurids and crocodiles.
The Lower Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation of Central
Utah is clearly an important formation and no doubt harbours many interesting
fossils from this crucial period in dinosaurian evolution. There are many clues
and I (amongst many) have been waiting for more remains of the elusive Cedar
Mountain tyrannosauroid to come to life – so far only represented by teeth. But
whilst waiting for that, another large theropod has appeared and Lindsay Zanno,
of the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, and colleagues have brought
this important new animal to light.
Firstly, not only does this animal represent another new
taxon, but, more importantly, represents the latest surviving allosauroid yet
known from North America. Although there is no skull material available, there
is enough of the skeleton to be able to refer the specimen to
Carcharodontosauria and particularly displays high axial pneumaticity. This
animal shares morphologies with the Neovenatoridae but the most anteriorly
positioned centra of the dorsal vertebrae are relatively elongate which
neovenatorids do not have. The posterior placed dorsals are similar to those of
Neovenator and Aerosteon whilst other details share characteristics with neither
carcharodontosaurids nor, indeed, Acrocanthosaurus.
This specimen extends the temporal overlap between
carcharodontosaurians and advanced tyrannosauroids in the Early Cretaceous of
Western North America although we must accept that there is still so much we do
not know about this time period and that sampling remains an issue and, by
implication, there remains a huge disparity in the phylogenetic make up of
these groups that were coeval at the time.
Next up and worth the wait - tyrannosaurs.
References
Noto, C.R. 2012. What big claws you have: implications of
morphological variation in theropod manual unguals. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, SVP Program and Abstracts Book,
2012, pp 150.
Rauhut, O.W. and Diego, P. 2012. A new basal tetanuran
theropod from the Early Middle Jurassic of Patagonia, Argentina. Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology, SVP Program and Abstracts Book, 2012, pp 160.
Snively, E., Cotton, J.T., Ridgeley, R.C. & Witmer, L.M.
2012. Feeding motions in Allosaurus (Dinosauria:
Theropoda): multibody dynamics of the cervicocephalic apparatus suggest rapid
lateral strikes but sagittal prey dismemberment. Journal of Vertebrate
Paleontology, SVP Program and Abstracts Book, 2012, pp 175.
Zanno, L.E., Makovicky, P.J. & Gates T.A. 2012. A new
giant carcharodontosaurian allosauroid form the Lower Cretaceous Cedar mountain
formation of Central Utah. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, SVP
Program and Abstracts Book, 2012, pp 199.


3 comments:
"a monophyletic Carnosauria is a very real possibility". Very happy to read this, since my analysis has been supporting a Carnosauria (=Allosauroidea+Megalosauroidea) for years.
"My feel from the authors on this is that they favour the first option."
Just to make sure I follow, would that mean that Allosauroidea & Megalosauroidea are more closely related to e/other than either is to Coelurosauria?
"This combination of evidence suggests that Allosaurus dismembered and fed on their carcasses very much like raptors of today and are therefore very different from tyrannosaurids and crocodiles."
Just to make sure I follow, is it safe to say that Witmer Lab's Allo study affirms Bakker 1998 & Rayfield et al. 2001?
Yes - that is how I interpret the results as well.
Post a Comment